2013-01-26

Let's all revisit 2012 for the weekend: Ambiguity, Presumption and vehement anticipation surrounding Spring Breakers



It's been a while since I've bombarded everyone with words. Last year, I had a problem listening to anything other than Kaputt, not just because it was so good, but school and life and stuff got in the way too. This last year, I graduated and found myself with an incredible amount of time at work, home, in the car and whatnot to gather and listen. Unfortunately, I didn't have access to a lot of the records that I more than likely would have ignored if they hadn't come in to WLFM (I don't work there anymore, sad faces). So there are a decent amount of records I never got around to acquiring this year (most notably: Kendrick Lamar, Killer Mike, Tallest Man on Earth, Aesop Rock, etc). I mean I tried, but there's only so much one bro can do. I also avoided downloading things I hadn't purchased, a strategy I am currently re-considering. For the most part, I only picked these things up if something peeked my interest somewhere somehow this year. If you're like, “Hey, where's blah blah,” there's a good chance I just didn't listen to it (or I just might not have enjoyed it that much, haha).

With that said, the main reason I still feel the urge to do this is based solely on how little contact I've had with most of you re: music. I've had very few conversations about non-academic music with any of you this year and that' totally not cool! I'm also posting it in Note form so I can hear what you guys loved and what you think I shouldn't have. 2012 really was a fantastic year. Some may say this is me going overboard, but I think I've conveyed my general feelings about my top 10 pretty well. So, let it begin. Tell me what I did wrong. 

Also, how excited are all of you for Harmony Korine's Spring Breakers?? I'm so excited. 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


1) Burial – Kindred EP | Truant/Rough Sleeper

Burial hasn't released a what-they-call “proper” LP in over 5 years. The only two he has released (debut Burial and follow-up Untrue) have, by now, garnered more acclaim and critical admiration than any other electronic release since. Critics, journalists, etc went ape-shit over the deeper implications of an unknown making these things. As if self-promotion and personal-elevation were somehow intertwined in the creation of music – that an unknown musician would deny the ability to make himself more famous was hard for most to figure out. It took three-years for Burial to re-enter the conversation. In 2011, he released three EP's, Ego / Mirror, Four Walls, and Street Halo. In total, Burial has now released 5 EP's since Untrue's release way back in 2007, avoiding a full-length release entirely. There's probably some angle in this – maybe the pressure seemed fake, the hype over-blown, the prospect of giving critics more of what they loved loathed – but the most important thing right-here is that he's released enough material in the last two years to make at least 2 full lengths. Kindred and Truant/Rough Sleeper (his 2012 releases), alone, fill close to an hour of space themselves. They also represent some of the most fascinating, captivating and emotional material electronic music's ever seen. So, yeah, some angle's there, just waiting to be taken. 

Burial has always stuck to his sound. There may have been some influences here and there, some now-forgotten UK-underground that found itself evolved, some remnant of early computer-produced dance-music that favored bass over melody – maybe bass as melody. But once Burial came out, Burial owned this shit. Everything that came before Burial in the development of early dubstep disappeared; it stopped mattering. If you've ever listened to one of his records, its his fucking sound, and the two EP's he's released this year represent some of the strongest and most effective material rooted in this sound. Kindred and Truant//Rough Sleeper are, while still steeped in this, quite different from everything he's done before. There are three tracks in total on Kindred and two in total on T//RS, as opposed to the 13 respective tracks on both of his previous LP's. These three tracks contain what might easily make up eight or nine songs on a Zomby or Mount Kimbie record; three arbitrary-distinctions-that-exist-just-for-the-label-and-fans named just for-the-sake-of-being-named (I wouldn't be surprised if Hyperdub named them). Within the context of Burial's body of work, these three distinctions function in an entirely different way. 

Burial often felt like an incredibly prodigious exercise in technique – testing which found-sound might work percussively, what drone might replace the wobble of mid-2000's two-step, how one might distort and pitch-shift the most out-of-place vocal sample to fit perfectly in an entirely different harmonic atmosphere, Burial ultimately represented a collection of songs. While Untrue was similar in its album structure, these prior techniques found themselves more refined. The drops on Untrue hit harder, the vocals meant more, the effect of the album was stronger because Burial as a producer was stronger. And although his name hasn't been everywhere in oh-11 and 12, Burial as a musical creator has most fucking definitely not stopped growing.

Kindred and Truant//Rough Sleeper represent the purely-emotional; a type of sound that rarely graces any genre, let alone electronic music. Kindred and Truant//Rough Sleeper exist in a world without logical ends. They exist in a world of ambiguous emotion, some indescribable feeling that plays well-beneath our senses. It's this effect that sets both of these combined-efforts above the rest this year. Within the five tracks that comprise both EP's, ideas contort, feelings sway, fragments interrupt fragments, conclusions answer the wrong questions. The notion that one might come close to capturing pure-emotion by somehow avoiding expression seems to have challenged Burial for the duration of his existence, but these two EP's represent the closest he's come to actual emotional replication. This music defies genre or style, names or influences, it exists as frequency with no baggage//no persuasion, hits in ways no other release could, connects to places we're not aware of. Kindred and Truant//Rough Sleeper are subconscious to the point of subliminality. While 2012 saw some truly spectacular releases, none pushed a musical genre further nor suggested such a limitless future. It's a shame that T//RS came out in mid-December. In the current state of music criticism, the “best-of-the-year” list only counts Janurary-November. I mean, y'all gonna think I stole all this shit from Mark Richardson, now that his review's out.  

TLDR: Burial's the best. These two EP's are probably his best. Cause it's like true emotion. Ya know, like no words getting in the way, or like any kind of face we can visualize singing and shit. AND his beats are dope. 


2) Fiona Apple – The Idler Wheel

To avoid any kind of misconception about me as cultural commentator or whatever the fuck it is that I'm doing right now, I have to admit that I had never properly listened to any of Fiona Apple's records before this 2012 release. Most sources will tell you that this is her first album in seven years. From my own experience with The Idler Wheel, it sounds as if she's been releasing records for the last seven years (read: it doesn't sound like she's been away that long). Sure, this record makes a great deal of sense when viewed as a long-term project, not unlike Big Boi's Sir Lucious, D'angelo's Voodoo, The Wrens The Meadowlands, etc, but the length of time it took The Idler Wheel to find fruition has in no way diminished its incredible immediacy. Point: I don't need to know the inevitable backstory to say that Fiona Apple's The Idler Wheel is a fucking bizarre collection of songs. But even through the jarring timbres, incredibly sparse ensemble support, angular melodic and uninviting lyrical content, The Idler Wheel's ability to connect is incredibly unique, almost unheard of.

In 2012, Fiona Apple finds herself in an extremely similar position to that of Joanna Newsom upon her 2010 release of Have One On Me. Ms. Newsom was already a critical darling by 2010. Having been briefly associated with the freak-folk movement (Walnut Whales, Milk-eyed Mender), a New Americana that placed her firmly in a trend of the time, by 2010, Joanna's peers and the movement itself had disappeared. 2010 saw Cosmogramma, My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy, Swim, This Is Happening, Teen Dream, etc – from these classics alone, we may draw an argument that purely-acoustic music was dying. As Simon Reynolds prophesied, 2010 was truly a year of Cyborg rock (like most years now). Have One on Me, however, was not that. Painstakingly long, entirely acoustic, unamplified to save-your-life – I mean christ, Joanna Newom's instrument is the harp – Have One on Me stood alone. Joanna Newom's music was never meant to exist as a trend.

The Idler Wheel, it seems, isn't suppose to either. Again, we find a similar mix of the electro-acoustic, hybridization, ambiguous origin, and the unknowns among 2012's great releases. And again, one album stands completely apart from the rest. There's nothing all that original about Fiona Apple's content matter either: self-doubt, relationships, heartbreak, dread, regret, lost-love, fucking-being-genuinely-crazy... this stuff's all been done before, and although arguably never as good or as unique, it's still the same. I thought this shit may have run its course, played itself out, but I have to argue that Fiona Apple's constructed one of the weirdest and most original vessels to bring us this same-old played-out material shit. 

These songs shouldn't work. The chromaticism of Fiona's piano often leads nowhere, she disregards any proper popular harmonic structure entirely. It's as if harmony's been forced against its will while chords beg to function. The psuedo-throwback-croonery of “Valentine” is accompanied by unnecessarily extended chords which never resolve... the rhythmically-simple albeit brooding chords of “Regret” clash against one another, within each other... “Jonathan”s implicitly playful meandering is almost child-like, “Left Alone”s rolling chromatics in the left hand really just exist because. A lot of this shit seems to exist just because. The instruments in this album sound like they don't want to be here. With true grace and command, Fiona Apple condemned harmony to the morose, a truly legitimate parallel with her fucking-nutso aesthetic. Basically, she gave herself a shit more room up top. 

What makes The Idler Wheel truly spectacular, what cements it well-within that large cannon of piano-pop is just how well Fiona Apple's voice sits on top of this dreary landscape. Not only are her melodies&vocals&lyrics more effective than any other pop album released in 2012, they hold everything around her together; the instruments on The Idler Wheel function solely as support. Point-in-case: “Left Alone.” Fiona controls the ensemble – her voice ushers in the incredibly gorgeous drones that swim below the chorus, her voice defines the subtlety and destroys the explicit, it conducts. Without it, the song is cacophonous, it's uninformed and misdirected. What truly sets The Idler Wheel apart from Shields or Lonerism or even Channel Orange, is that everything within the album represents a part of Fiona Apple. Or at least whatever form of Fiona Apple she decided to divulge. If I may pull a far-fetched comparison here; Destroyer's Kaputt is Dan Bejar's conversation with others, The Idler Wheel is Fiona Apple's conversation with herself. 

TLDR: Fiona Apple's The Idler Wheel is really fucking bizarre. Just like her. If we have to have lyrics with a face, I'd prefer no one else (save Joanna Newsom) sing them and like totally morph into it. Ya know? 


3) Andy Stott – Luxury Problems

Luxury Problems was my favorite release of oh-12 for a good two months following its release. I've now had a bit of time to re-calibrate and analyze and what not, but the fact remains: this albums was this-close to number 1. The main reason being quite simple – I fucking love Andy Stott. There's not much more to it than that, and although fairly shallow and a little boring, I think it's fair. He's really just got everything for me; crazy good production, slamming beats, stark timbres, and Modern Love's great musical image for the sound. With Luxury Problems, it seems as though Andy Stott's perfected much. This kind of bias and personal taste never plays into the The Lists, and I miss that a bit. 

I mean, I guess the “Staff Lists” do; they never align with the actual carved-in-stone “forever” lists (just like mine looks nothing like any other commentator's), but websites still post them. I'd be lying, like most would, if my own opinions aligning with the taste-makers didn't bring incredible satisfaction to, well, me. For instance, if I personally thought that Kendrick Lamar's record was the best of the year, and then pitchfork went and picked it best-of-the-year, Jesus. Especially if I was pushing it on a whole shit-ton of people. It's pure vindication, and while quite unhealthy, it is selfishly rewarding. Sometimes, I can't help but feel that this need-for-vindication may have somehow at some point found root deep within my subconcious; maybe it's the reason why I force so much music on so many people. It's a terrible thing to think, I know (or maybe y'all feel this way, lol). Or it could just be that I like fucking awesome music a ton and can't help but talk about it. It's one of those 

Anyway, back to Mr. Stott. Luxury Problems is fucking awesome. Yeah. There is a decent amount of history behind Andy Stott and this album specifically – at least more than his previous releases – but I think it adds nothing to the experience. I could talk about the implications of utilizing an actual human voice for manipulation and application rather than vocal samples, and how that human voice happened to be his former piano teacher, or whatever. I think this approach is dumb and detracts from its effectiveness. If you don't like it, then I'll just assume that it's not your thing and we can agree to disagree. But check it out. It represents the best release within it's electronic sub-genre, in my opinion. I'm going with the more optimistic approach here: I love awesome music and want you all to listen to this and tell me if you like it, ya know? 


4) Laurel Halo – Quarantine

Laurel Halo has become part of an ostensibly continuous albeit unique breed of DIY twenty-ten's electronic musicians. Unique in that, while the DIY-mentality has always existed, well beneath within and around electronic music, never before has it been the norm. Sure, some of electronic music's masterpieces were constructed entirely by their creators (Twoism, Ambient works 1985-1994, Since I Left You, BCD), but it seems that only recently has this DIY mentality become something held in higher regard to that of the standard: record label promotion, pre-purchased gear, alternative radio spins, and thousands upon thousands of dollars in whatever. Andy Stott, Lee Gamble, Grimes, Demdike Stare, Actress, Lindstrom, Vatican Shadow etc. The relative ease at which album-ready material can be achieved via the plethora of “professional” software suites readily available to you-and-me surely accounts for this rise in trend... perhaps even a little from the decline in price and availability of old semi-pro and pro-level reel-to-reels, DAT's, even cassette recorders (this may be more of a shameless-plug than I'm comfortable with). 

I had the incredible pleasure of seeing Laurel at the 7th street a couple months back, and boy was it mind-altering. She may very well be one of the most-talented electronic performers among this bunch, definitely the most-talented I've seen. Her command of an entire table of hardware, pedals, keyboards and effected microphones was dazzling. And so much different from this album. It's pretty clear where Laurel Halo came from. Her last LP, Hour Logic, is much more dance-floor than the introspective post-ambient experiement of Quarantine. Hour Logic sounds like a live-set, where Quarantine doesn't quite immediately reveal it's ability to so-easily move. And while her latest effort plays much better on headphones than it does in, say, a venue, she didn't play Quarantine at the 7th street. She played something entirely different, but much more unique. Each track was manipulated, each track transformed via improvisation and effection. While the melody of “Years” was audible, the structure of the album version was not. And even though Quarantine strays from dance's roots, favoring slowly filtered synths-as-bass over implied kicks, startling-verging-on-annoying mixing techniques, and effect efficiency, the energy of the club is still present. But It's hardly noticeable. Live, it was obvious what her intentions were: She was taking just as many shots of Jameson as the crowd (even offering her handle to the bros up front). Laurel Halo's in this for a great time. 

But Quarantine “The Album” is much more of a downer than Laurel would have you think. While I wouldn't necessarily call “Airsick” a jam, it certainly focuses much more on the textures of the rhythm than the often explicit nature of the words. Now, this may very well be my ostensibly deaf ear for lyrics, or more exactly, my inability to really understand what anyone's truly singing about, but I (like I'd like to imagine some others) had to look up the lyrics to kind of, ya know, get examples for y'all. That is, the lyrics are not what this albums is initially about. Sure, she sings and there's words and stuff, but it's clear that Laurel doesn't want us to really pay much attention to them. She'd rather have us hum along enough so as to almost subconsciously memorize them. The sounds always take precedent, right up until they don't. And even when she's singing and her voice is full-front-up-on-stage-like, she's taken a sort top-down approach to harmony not unlike This Heat's approach on Deceit. 

Amongst all of this, there's a spooky notion that may very well trump most of the sounds: she's having a fucking great time singing some just downright aching shit. “Your eyes make all the misery come worthwhile/ Yet all I want is to rid of them” || “They come and fuck alone / the blackest night I saw you cry” || “You'll make love to cold bodies / Fresh after they're gone” || etc. I mean, there's a ton of heartbreak and misery buried here. And this misery is always obscured by her approach to harmony and her continual focus on electronic textures that tend to forcefully shift our attention elsewhere. But nonetheless, I've found myself unknowingly singing “I will never see you again / You're mad because I will not leave you alone,” only later (kind of right now) realizing that these songs really do pack a heartfull of punch. While it's rare (and still almost cliché) to have sad lyrics paired with happy music (a bad summation, I know), it's rarer still to have such ambiguous emotions tied to each aspect of a record (lyrics vs. sound). There's hurt in this record, and Laurel Halo's done a spectacular job confusing, denying, and messing with it's ultimate meaning. She's done singing a favor. Hyperdub, you always choose the best. 

TLDR: Laurel Halo's messed up cause she's looks so happy singing this stuff, and it's really morose. I guess it does take a while to realize that, maybe she hasn't realized that yet. 


5) Liars – WIXIW

Liars' prodigious ability, the one where they regularly make great records and whatnot, has become a bit of a problem for the band. The consistency they've always watermarked every record with, one their strongest attributes, appears to be hurting their once-solid ability to generate hype. Nothing else seems to explain why WIXIW was ignored so thoroughly this year. By now, it's fair to say that Liars has amassed the strongest body of work among any band in the past decade. Their 2012 addition to this incredible oeuvre is no different, a record complete with: new thematic material, an incredibly stark aesthetic change, and a genuinely self-reflective voice that had always been ignored for their hilariously ironic socialist-commentary. Unlike the years '01, '04 '06, '07, '10, however, people kind of forgot about this new addition. It may be their strongest effort to date, but I have this strange feeling that WIXIW didn't happen... 

So, why? Well... Liars had previously approached every record before with a new sense of purpose, each album a new derision, new aggression, new comedy, in brief, they'd always donned a new muse: They Threw Us All in a Trench and Stuck a Monument on top their definition of 21st century post-punk, They were Wrong, So We Drowned a bizarre trip into experimental dance-rock, Drums Not Dead one of the wildest concept albums ever created, and so on. Each record found them in new-form, and each record forced the listener to adapt to whatever aesthetic they were currently exploiting. Their consistency of embodying modernism's defining characteristic (change through positive progression) kept them comfortably nestled in the critical arms of admiration. Up until this record, their shocking ability to stay fresh through re-invention assured their widespread critical acclaim. 

What makes WIXIW's release so puzzling, then, is how little attention their starkest-change-yet has garnered; I mean they really fucking changed it up. Most every instrument they used to rely-on has been replaced by their “color” instruments of the past: electronics, synthesizers, drum-machines, sequencers, analog circuitry, etc. The heavy-as-hell distortion that so ruthlessly defined this band is gone, along with the hardcore heaviness it (they) used to shove in your face. Subtler and more obscure electronic acts like Bjork and Tricky have replaced their long-term devotional influences; bands liked This Heat, Killing Joke, Can and Faust have disappeared from the palette. Where pre-2012 Liars was a constantly evolving shape-shifting motherfucker of a band, 2012 Liars is something I haven't had enough time to call by weird phrase. 

The only explanation I could convoke is based on the experience of another band's from a couple years ago, Radiohead, specifically, The King of Limbs. And it's not even that great of an explanation because TKOL had a shit-load of hype surrounding it's release, it just wasn't very good. But in similar fashion, expectations surrounding a band that had, like Liars, defined itself through constant evolution got boring for the press. With TKOL, Radiohead lost their entitled-voice because the record kinda sucked (or at least kinda sucked in comparison to the rest of their incredible albums, which is unfair). WIXIW, however, does not, in both regards. This record is a Liars record; it does what every one of their records does, and it does that shit well. Maybe they reached the point where people stopped caring whether they might finally fall off, if they could finally be forgotten, that one bad record might cement them in the past. 

WIXIW is what The King of Limbs wanted to be, without the newspaper-edition-hype or confusing blotter-paper-insert. It's startlingly depressing, genuinely beautiful, and moody as all hell. They've traded in their guitars for orchestral synthesizer washes (The Exact Color of Doubt), rock-drums for minimal, downtempo club (His and Mine Sensations), and about as good a dance track as any made this year (Brats). They've completely changed their influences – Bjork, Tricky, and the minimalism of Basic Channel rather than the typical dose of experimental-rock prophets. WIXIW is a record of introspection, self-reflection, and solitude. It's dark and desperate, anxious and unsettling. It's not going to ruin your friends the way “Plastercasts” or “Scarecrows” did, nor exude the type of evil their live shows used to (although Angus' childlike delivery of “WIXIW” live may have been eviler than anything I saw 2 years ago). It is, however, going to stick around longer. It's going to effect you more than anything they've done before. That kind of staying power's a high-commodity this day and age. 

TLDR: You can still dance to it.  


Continued below

Let's all revisit 2012 for the weekend: Ambiguity, Presumption and vehement anticipation surrounding Spring Breakers, Pt 2


6) Grizzly Bear – Shields

There are a couple records here that I just like for their own sake; I can't really explain them, over-think them or even analyze them because I can't really figure out why I like them so much. Shields is one of these. Briefly, this record rocks the sounds, timbres, and structures I've come to love from rock bands. And, as my list may be evidence of enough, there aren't a whole lot of those things here. The breed is dying, but I digress. Yellow House solidified this band as important, Veckatimest showed they had realized this importance and could take themselves too seriously. Shields, however, absolutely screams growth; exploring the outer reaches of early post-rock (Colour of Spring, TNT), grasping further at a certain subtle-juxtaposition-aesthetic that YH hinted at (“Adelma,” they're almost there), and constructing the greatest critically-relevant Opus since Runaway (“Sun in Your Eyes”). The production is flawless, the engineering is perfect, and their voices are as good as ever. Sure, the lyrical content hasn't changed at all – I still have no idea what they're singing about – but that's not why us-people-who-listen-to-Grizzly-Bear listen to Grizzly Bear. I haven't quite figured that one out yet. 

7) Vatican Shadow – Ornamented Walls // Jordanian Descent

A whole lot of things can be inferred about Vatican Shadow that will most likely end up being true simply through his album and track names (“India has just Tested a Nuclear Device,” “Church of the NSA,” “Nightforce Scopes,” etc, etc). Obviously, he's a political dude (see: the Joe Biden-framed EP cover for Operation Neptune Spear), but his music strictly focuses on the brutal. More specifically, the brutality of War, especially the ostensibly ambiguous nature of 21st century War; technological warfare. His image is equally serious: Mr. Fernow (as VS) most commonly rocks Desert-Storm-style camo, military-grade shades, and a fuck-you-up kind of expression. He's got an image, I'll just leave it at that.

But, as it were, I'm in no position to comment on his image, validate his implications, or even really discuss his message. Vatican Shadow's music is almost exclusively word-less; he's a soundscaper. So... any implied political themes or negative commentary on the state of war et al. appear solely through the titles he applies to each song. Without these titles (and maybe a slight oversight of the not-so-common middle-eastern folk-songs he samples, onceinawhile), this music could really be called whatever VS liked. These albums could very well have been named “Flower,” or “Sunrise,” the tracks “Lost One,” or “I Miss You,” or some other messed-up title that would more than likely not be happy like these; the effect would have most likely been the same. Regardless of the political track names and brutal design, this music is still fucking heavy as shit. One can call this whatever one likes, but one's still getting messed up by it. 

Again, we find another indescribable, genre-less style that happens to grab attention because it's just plain fantastic. Ornamented Walls and Jordanian Descent are some of the most effective releases of the year, if not purely for their sonic qualities. Obviously, I don't necessarily buy into the political implications he's assigned each track/album, but that doesn't change their quality. He just releases so much god damn music, I'm very envious of this. 


8) Frank Ocean – Channel Orange

Woah. Dude. Ok, hold on now. Frank Ocean exploded in 2012; he actually probably blew up. Could you run that back so I can see it? I was too busy avoiding this record for a very petty reason; its hype. Everything surrounding Channel Orange's release made me look away: a member of Odd Future releasing a neo-soul RnB throwback record, with the worst album title, most disgusting artwork, he's my age, and every single person on earth's going to love it? I'm not going to dissect this, it's all right there. One of my self-proclaimed biggest short-comings: my inability to ignore the hype, or I guess, buy into it, another way to look at it I suppose. What should have a been a release-to-look-forward-to back in May or June was one I dreaded. And for no reason other than to avoid the hype. If I only knew someone was going to actually probably blow up. 

In reality, the record didn't live up to all the hype. Channel Orange, musically, is ¾ of a masterpiece, it's almost the greatest R n' B record since Voodoo, it's almost the greatest major label release since, I don't know, Kid A. It's almost the best record of the year, the same way The ArchAndroid Pt. 1 was almost the best record of 2010. But it's definitely not “almost” a Def Jam release -Or- It's “almost” not a Def Jam release. One of those will work. 

In all seriousness, the first ten tracks on Channel Orange are incredible. As a singular voice, these ten tracks rival Fiona Apple’s presence as an artistic singer/songwriting force – the presence just exists over a calmer/easier landscape with more-obvious themes sung by a much saner dude. Comparison to The Idler Wheel, however trifling, seems surprisingly apt. Both records are all about the main singer, the main character, the main storyline. (Fiona Apple, see: above). For Frank Ocean, it’s an earnest look at modern twenty-something's, often with marginally negative analyses of the classes above him, viewed and made in the wake of a tragic emotional experience, which blurs the conventionally defined right/wrong distinctive lines of socially typical events. Ocean was hurt before he wrote these songs. It seems that he can’t always voice his frustrations about them, so these frustrations bleed onto other aspects of his life. A lot of this dissatisfaction verges on silliness: Lucky Charms, daddy’s Jaguar, Landscapers, beach houses in Idaho (???), geographic locations generally disassociated from anything important (Denver, Idaho, Ohio, etc). There’s an arcane sense of the paltry throughout Channel Orange; on paper, most of these elements are throw-away’s; thrown away like the expulsion of Ben Folds’ Rocking the Suburbs, generally considered silly enough to just disregard.

But Frank Ocean sings these song with such a genuine passion, such dedicated affection, it’s hard to not take him seriously. And what’s more is that goddamn voice. I’m scared to even write this, but Frank Ocean’s falsetto may be the greatest RnB falsetto to hit a record since D’Angelo’s. From the very first notes (“Do you not think so far ahead?”), it casts a deep shadow across the music whenever it appears. It’s never meant to rouse us like Beyonce’s wail or Jeremih’s sometimes-auto-tuned lines, the way we’re used to, the way we want it to – his falsetto’s meant for the truly heartbreaking moments. Although the content matter is sometimes petty, the words-themselves purportedly banal, his voice is definitely not; the emotional weight he carries is such a burden, a weight that makes any letdown deeply emotional, hurt that affects everything in our lives, not just our feelings about the singular person who may have caused it. That’s what makes this record incredible, or at least everything through “Pyramids.” 
After that, it falls off. The songs lose their edge, the melodies don't catch, a lot of this is filler, and it really brings down the entire record. That still doesn't change what came before, but it definitely hurts it's overall impact. It's a shame. I don't know who's responsible, but I really wish someone would have said, “Hey, let's just do like two more songs after Pyramids and call it.” But with all the people involved, they needed to make it seem grand and make money. There's no need, it would have made money regardless. 

TLDR: You're always smoking in the house, what if my mother comes over?


9) Lee Gamble – Diversions 1994-1996

I had never heard of Lee Gamble before Boomkat pushed him all over 2012 for me. A relatively unknown, this record was constructed entirely from the more ambient-and-ethereal-breaks of Mr. Gamble's jungle/dnb record collection (all ostensibly released from 94-96). As some of you know, I absolutely adore sample-based electronic music. Some of the albums I've found myself most influenced by were constructed in this same manor, just with different source material: DJ Shadow's Endtroducing..., Quiet Village Silent Movie, The Avalanches Since I Left You, etc. Diversions 1994-1996 is a welcome addition. It's also one of the most effective ambient records released in years. Layered textures, floating ambiguity, occasional breakbeats (ok, just the one breakbeat). The complexity of such a novel, un-thought-of dichotomy (collage/foundsound structure and background aesthetic) is scary. 


10) Swans – The Seer // We Rose from Your Bed with the Sun in our Head

A towering volume of words was written about Swans' The Seer this year; I'll keep it short. There's a reason this record barely made my top 10, and yes, it might be slightly irrational, but My Father Will Guide Me Up a Rope to the Sky still remains Michael Gira's best and much better than this. He proclaimed The Seer as the culmination of his entire life's work, the second-coming of whatever-you-like in 3 LP form, Revelations, 7 lilies. He may feel that way, but I don't. The Seer is over-indulgent, unnecessarily long, and sprawling in the worst sense. It's unfocused, wrought with questionable decisions, and devoid of even the slightest hint of meaning. I realized that these negative feelings festered/bloomed through my constant comparisons to My Father, so this is me ignoring those cognizant irrationalities and putting it in a place that I guess makes sense. I mean, this is still Swans. There's still that. 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11. Spiritualized – Sweet Heart, Sweet Light
12. Grimes – Visions
13. Nadja – Dagdrom
14. Godspeed You! Black Emperor – Allelujah!
15. Miguel – Kaleidoscope Dream
16. Julia Holter - Ekstasis
17. Jeremih – Late Nights with Jeremih
18. Dan Deacon – America
19. Prins Thomas – Prins Thomas
20. Holly Herndon – Movement
21. Brian Eno – LUX
22. Wolfgang Voigt – EP
23. Lindstrom – Smalhans
24. Earth – Angels of Darkness, Demons of Light II
25. Tame Impala – Lonerism   

2012-07-08

Romantic dinner realizations and terrifying legal anxiety: 2012 ½ way




So it's time again for everyone's half way to the end of the year round up. On my part, I wanted to a write a little about spending money on music aka buying albums. I've been doing it. Yes, that's right. I made a pact around February somewhat randomly to start paying for albums; specifically digital albums.  I used to have a certain moral objection to paying for digital music (we're talking naivete's). Itunes, rhapsody, amazon et al. These multi-million-dollar conglomerates provided lazy people seeking instant gratification ghostly, decaying outlines of an artwork created for physical appreciation, all-the-while, profiting on absentee-packaged middle-school grade rips; the Kindle of music consumption. I guess this same argument could be made against illegal (i.e. not paid for) digital music, but at least, in this case, you're paying what the content is worth (nothing).  [edit - I forgot to mention this:] I guess, just maybe, this moral objection blossomed out of my inability to stay away from these multi-million dollar conglomerates; it's hard to stray from instant gratification.  I often found myself using these huge services, like most people.  I was angry with myself.

My sudden change of heart came about out of both necessity and idealism. SOPA and PIPA did not in fact, as you all know, pass in our Government's grand decision making arena. Like it shouldn't have. But, for those of you who haven't been google-searching “[insert artist/album title here] mediafire” or some other mass-storage website may not have realized, it basically passed. The SOPA/PIPA ordeal coupled with the extremely dramatic takedown of KIM.com's Megaupload empire scared (maybe bullied) these similarly-minded hosting sites into the removal of illegal material. Those of you who have been searching these “mediafire” extensions know quite well that the illegal market has dried up, at least for in the direct-download sector. For the last several months, these types of searches resulted in numerous “this link has been removed by google's blah blah blah”, which meant: shit. Now, there's not even a reminder that they used to be there – they just don't show up.

I'll backtrack here and say that I've never successfully used bitorrent, but God did I want to. I used to like to think that I was relatively computer-savvy, but until my computer died and I started using Linux, I never figured it out. When I finally did figure it out, another force was hindering my illegal music consumption: terror, or anxiety – one of the two. The fact that google was now monitoring it's searches (obviously from their internal removal of prohibited results) scared the shit out of me. Remember when that middle-aged Minnesota woman was fined $1.9 million for downloading 24 songs two-years ago? When google wasn't monitoring their search results, it seemed ok; illegal stuff came up, meaning other people were doing it too. Like, probably at least one-thousand if “PJ Harvey let england shake zip” was the second suggested search result when I started typing in PJ Harvey.... I can take my chances with one in a thousand. But Google removing links? Then they definitely had the power to remove me from all the money I will ever make in my life. So, yeah, necessity.

The other kind of startling truth about all of this is that I had been illegally downloading music for a couple years. The amount was never superfluous – maybe an album or two every couple weeks. I always justified it by saying something like, “I'm going to buy it on vinyl”, or “I don't like really like the band, I just want to measure the hype.” Working at a radio station also helped... But, I would download an album here or there, just to see what it was about. Ultimately, I felt I had no other choice. I was in school, didn't have a job, no money, no record store within walking distance. And with the pure mass of music gaining coverage by our music bibles, what is one to do? Just not get that album? So I did it.

Two things just really hit me a couple months ago. I was at Chipotle for the third time that week, dropping $8 for some tacos, when I realized that I had already spent three times what 1 digital album costs in three days. Fuck dude. What the hell was I doing with my money? I was throwing it (continuously) at of something that kept me satisfied for an hour, all the while stealing music from musicians who put months, sometimes years, into making a piece of artwork that could provide years of satisfaction. Jesus, man. My priorities were fucked. Also, how the fuck could I expect anyone to pay for something that I might/will/am creating when I'm stealing the shit out of it? That's the second thing, but it's not as romantic as the Chipotle realization.

I do, however, think that illegal downloading and the culture of music consumption in general today has a lot to say about the music industry, specifically, musicians and the way in which consumers/appreciators connect with them. Quite frankly, it's the music industry's fault that the majority of music lovers acquire music via quote-unquote illegal sources. Only because the way in which a majority of music-lovers acquire music is still considered illegal. The music corporations (read Warner, EMI, Atlantic, et al) are still trying to gonna party like its 1999. And while the 21st century has seen the emergence of an entirely rabid breed of young people craving “new” music, these corporations assume their old-guard system will function the same, or rather, needed to function the same; instead of adapting to a new and (begrudgingly) profitable culture of hyper-collecting and digital hoarding, they decided to throw millions at politicians and fuck-over the women of Minnesota!

The solution to the whole music-industry issue is out there. There's money to be made in music, if not entirely because of the fans. If people just hated music today, it'd be a lot easier to understand why the big record companies are struggling like they are. It'd be easier to understand why SOPA was actually an issue and pirates were fined millions: protecting the glory I'm sure these companies once felt they bathed in. But in a culture when no one knows enough, and even people who think they know everything don't know enough, I can't help feeling no pity for these record companies. And it's terrible that the musicians (the letter-writers) signed to these companies are the ones that are ultimately suffering. Or, at least, that's what they'd like you to think. But it's hard to pity the 99million Nicki Minaj or LMFAO are making. For some reason, these one-percenters get a break from criticism, cause they make art.

Really, I think the fact that most people (myself included) find it easier and essentially more satisfying to get a digital album for free in our current state rather than pay for it is startling; this should be the issue labels are looking at. Prohibition doesn't work, so congress and corporations, stop trying to utilize it. Record labels – make it easy for us to pay for your shit. Make it easy to support the musicians you promote. Sadly, that's what hoarders want. If any of us have to go out of our way to buy something, we're not going to if we can go out of our to get it for free. Change your system, you might be surprised.

What triggered my shift from free music acquisition to economic music acquisition, besides the irrationally mounting terror associated with millions of dollars in fines/rape fees (whichever you prefer), was ultimately the promise I saw in several labels. A story I read about Stone Throw's decision to join the extremely progressive drip.fm spurred my interest in actually paying for digital music. I mean, they basically give it to you, like, hand it to you for a convenience charge. I guaranty you people would pay for music if it cost $0 with a $10 shipping and handling fee, which is basically what drip.fm is. From there, I searched around and found other sites that might, at least, offer music I couldn't get on itunes. After my list of half-year favorites, I've listed several websites. Also – I love 2012 so far.

  1. Fiona Apple – Idler Wheel
  2. Liars – WIXIW
  3. Spiritualized – Sweet Heart, Sweet Light
  4. Grimes – Visions
  5. Burial – Kindred
  6. Wolfgang Voigt – EP
  7. Earth – Angels of Darkness, Demons of Light II
  8. Big Krit – Return to 4eva
  9. Julia Holter -Ekstasis
  10. Demdike Stare - Elemental

2012-06-24

Shackleton Rising




Let's talk about preference. Personal preference to be more precise, and it's impact on opinions. Ok – I guess it's obvious that personal preference is opinions. It's impossible to separate one's own personal preference from the opinions that person develops, and in developing, forming arguments for or against something that, well, requires or does not require an argument. As a singular thought machine, it's not just hard, it's impossible to objectively approach a subject that one cares about. So, I've always taken a fond interest in entities that rely on singular beings to state opinions that are entirely representative of what those entities believe. Just a little observation.

Shackleton has been at this for about as long as Aphex Twin has not, and he's been doing it about as well as anyone. Three years ago, when I first discovered him, he had a label called Skull Disco with an album called Skull Disco. Put yourself in post-Aphex Twin electronic music three years ago land – before dubstep was Dubstep, before Skrillex and Bassnectar (re: brostep) – ultimately go back to Burial's Untrue. Shackleton was making music many people considered dubstep, but that genre label didn't matter. Not one person listening to Burial, Appleblim, Shackleton, Skream, etc. really cared to define what it was. Or if they did, the definition was never solid. We had our own ideas (mine): the simple combination of two terms that seemed to describe the music being made/categorized under the moniker (Dub music and Two-step). I had no idea what Two-step was – probably because it mostly existed in the UK underground – obviously I was over here. But no one really knew what the fuck it was. Dub music, maybe. But I have a feeling the meaning of Dub is different to Americans. Just a hunch.

Dubstep meant nothing except bass and drums. It embodied a certain mystical “new” sound (maybe one of the reasons it caught on so fervently in the last year). Artists like Burial and Shackleton gave it that mysticism; cryptic vocals, atypical dance beats, late-night atmospherics. Shackleton was lumped into this category for a time, until most critics realized he was more of an “uncategorizeable” musician and made that fact know. Now Burial and Shackleton, in my opinion, couldn't be further apart as 2012 electronic music ticks by. Shackleton's sound was, up until Music for the Quiet Hour, quite simply this: tension and release (Bass + rhythm = build + drop). I too will plead unable-to-categorize. What set Shackleton apart from a lot of other bass-musicians who followed this incredibly simple summation of its tendencies was the duration and means he took in accomplishing said drop. His songs always dropped, that was kind of his thing, but the build was always radically different from his peers.

As hard has been to categorize Shackleton, there had always been a formula to his music. Despite the idiosyncratic “musicological” percussion on top, Shackleton, for the most part, stayed true to the simple structure of tension-and-release; build-to-drop. Up until now, no matter what he was doing, this formula stayed consistent. And while Three EP's pushed the limits of what most would consider acceptable lengths of tension, the simple-eternal formula was always there.

Music for the Quiet Hour, however, is startling, foremost in how far Shackleton has strayed from the arguably rigid backbone of dance music. Having followed Shackleton for several years now, my expectations were solidly in place upon first listen – I thought I knew what I was getting myself into. Of course, no help. The first “Hour” (it's really more like 64 minutes, but I won't fault Sam), is a monolithic piece of work – dynamically, timbre-ally, percussionally, intentionally, et al. The piece is split arbitrarily into 5 parts. 5 parts that sometimes play as breath marks, other times as interruptions. Ultimately, it's a demonstration in electronic virtuosity, new computer dynamicity – paired with one very obvious mistake.

Now, I'm going to hypothesize a bit here. A self-conducted interview with the man is a little unattainable at current, so my estimations will have to do. Having followed his releases for several years, I've noticed a certain tenacity for progression within his own work – sort of this rivalry between albums, one after the other, of out-doing, well, the previous one. It seems like Shackleton's been consistently raising his own standard for each record, intentionally trying to out perform himself. For me, this tenacity is audible on Shackleton's most recent work Typically, this kind of rivalry exists between bands or musicians hence it's not always as obvious. But for a guy like Shackleton, who really has no peers, the human need for competition plays as if he's trying to outdo himself. Music for the Quiet Hour, fair to say, is the soundtrack to Shackleton's self-made electronic obstacle course. Often, it's just straight-up the obstacle course. It's the aural representation of Shackleton's attempt at tackling it, the aural-film of Sam climbing a rope, jumping over something, crawling through mud – I don't know, whatever part of this analogy works better for you, throw it in there. Because of this, Hour is not as much a challenge for us as it is for him. It's almost easier to understand the piece through this lense, and in that sense, Music for the Quiet Hour is exhausting.

The challenge for us is understanding where he's going with the whole thing. I would have liked to have had the capacity to approach this monster without expectations, but you know, that doesn't really work. Without expectations (say, the fourth time through), the exhaust isn't there – it's easier. But I found myself, quite literally, closing in on the edge of whatever respective seat I was in, waiting for that fucking drop. It never came – the tension was exhausting. But really, thank you Shackleton for slapping me silly for expecting that shit. Cause really, you're (he's) better than that.

The crowning achievement of the first hour is just that – even if you've never listened to his music – the tension is so effective it's hard not to expect some monster beat or hook to emerge. How this tensions-without-release plays on our view of dance music altogether is wildly out-there and totally commendable. Hour is a vast exploration of computer-based electronica. Some people have described it as a musicological goldmine of textures, timbres, pitches and sound(s) altogether. For the most part I agree. Not that this is something entirely new to Shackleton – I've always marveled at his ostensibly un-preset sound and pattern usage – far removed from the ordinary in electronic-dance. In relation to his previous explorations into sound, Hour has grown immensely. Shedding “the drop” aesthetic throughout the piece frees him from tendencies he once relied on. Part 1 feels like a build, and upon first, listen it is. As I said above, new sounds are at work here. The rhythms are far more organic, a glorious exploration of implying time. Where his previous releases always felt programmed, Part 1 is the first time Shackleton relies on texture above rhythm, working a level above the cinematic build.

Part 2, then, feels like the drop. For a minute it is. But Instead of an all-out dance party somewhere around minute three of Part 2, he shifts the cymbal (4 against 3) and fucks everything up – that's first-time-through-me speaking. The metric modulation here is fascinating, it's a complete break from everything Shackleton. Instead of climaxing via poly-rhythm around minute mark 3:30, he let's the poly-rhythm become the rhythm entirely. Instead of routing the tension created by this rhythmic layering back to the original tempo for that Deadmau5 fist-pumping moment we expect, our fists quite literally detach themselves from their respective appendage(s). The thumb-piano drops out completely as the thin-cymbals usher us in to completely unchartered Shackleton-territory: pure noise. Minute mark 5 is a glorious anti-climax - one of several instances on this record where Shackleton reminds us that he's not in it this time for the jams; he has other intentions.

Crickets chirp over sub-sonic demon-bass in anticipation – I mean even Arvo Part couldn't not do something with this now thirteen minute build. Then 6:10 hits – or 13:45 if you're counting this by the hour. Remember that minute mark, that glorious 13:45 journey into all things technically electronically virtuosic. Actually, you might just want to skip to “(For the) Love of Weeping” right around 13:44 because it is at this precise moment that I (and you will) find out what the build is actually for.

Vengeance Tenfold. That's what it's for. Some quick Internet research says he's some spoken word “artist”. But I'd rather not give this “artist” credit – I hadn't heard of him, I wasn't planning on mentioning his name, had no idea there was any kind of collaboration underway for Shack's new LP, and sure as hell did not expect this. What follows these jubilant thirteen minutes and forty-odd seconds is one of the biggest mistakes I've witnessed on record in a long while. Send in the clowns, Sam. It's a shame that the bulk of my review ends here – points off my unscathed record, I know.

In a recent interview for pitchfork.tv's Call and Respond, God himself (J Spaceman), in describing some of the reasoning behind his mixing techniques, said, “as soon as you put a voice on a record, that's fifty-percent of the space used.” In Spaceman's case, devoting fifty-percent of said space to the voice is necessary – Spiritualized lyrics tend to carry some weight. But I'd argue, in the case of Music for the Quiet Hour, that this guy deserves, at most, five-percent at any given time. When those first 13-minutes of one-hundred-percent Shackleton genius find themselves so rudely interrupted, our entire focus shifts to this guy and what he's saying; we're human. We like human sounding things - so the remaining fifty minutes focus on this entirely. Even when Tenfold isn't talking, we're anticipating what he'll say next.

So back to that whole personal preference thing I was ranting about above: you should still give the rest of this “hour” a chance. You might like it, might understand what it is, what it's trying to accomplish, might think nothing of his voice (like most people). But I absolutely hate this guy, or at least how he sounds in a spoken word context (re: his voice). It's the most unfortunate pairing of two worlds: an entirely organic, spacious, exhilarating world of modern computer-music underneath the most annoying, hyper-extended, over-produced, trying-to-hard-just-because shit. I mean, there's probably a point – and when he finally stops talking, there's kind of this “Oh” moment, like the moment everyone experiences at the end of Blade Runner. But unlike Ridley Scott's masterwork, there's no value in trying to figure out what's going on – even if there is some kind of message this dude is spewing, there's no way the meaning could undo what his egregious presence on top of the beauty does. I mean, at least Blade Runner was visually amazing the first time through, even if I didn't really get it. At least there was something there aesthetically to latch on to amidst the confusion.

It would be misleading to say Tenfold speaks for the rest of the hour because he doesn't. The last third of Part 2 into the majority of Part 3 finds us entirely immersed, again, in Shackleton's domain. But Part 4, which also happens to be the obligatory centerpiece, relies entirely on Tenfold's phantom conversation with another character played by none-other, ending in that “Oh” moment I mentioned above. By the time the hour finishes and we've tried (at length) to discern and make sense of what Tenfold has spewed out, there's no reward. It's startling how quickly one ultra-confused component can effect something that makes so much sense.

I'd also be kidding you if I didn't say this: I do appreciate the effort. Electronic music has a rich history of blending -or- attempting to blend these dualities: the computerized and the living. The irony in all of this is that Music for the Quiet Hour shows us how alive Shackleton's music is. How much he's transcended the mechanized. I'd like to think that this was their sick goal all along. The intention of both Shackleton and Vengeance Tenfold may very well have been to trade roles (Shackleton as alive, Tenfold as totally not). In doing so, Music for the Quiet Hour may function better as an eye-opening critique on the nature of musicians today: technology is far more alive than we are. At the very least, it'd be a little easier to swallow such an egregious mistake if we viewed Vengeance Tenfold as a fucking martyr. 



Photo: Justin Farrar
Foxydigitalis

2012-04-07

Destroyer's Kaputt. The Re-Establishment of Fine Caviar -or Who the Fuck Eats Caviar?


Destroyer. Kaputt. My year. Done. This is a response to the misguided praising of an album that deserved far more respect and admiration than it's received to date. This is about Destroyer's 2011 album Kaputt. And I want to start with something almost entirely unrelated.
*(If you prefer to relate, you can skip my life story and continue at the appropriate asterisk.)

Smooth Jazz. A certain part of my soul will forever be branded by its foul existence. I never talk about this, but my parents absolutely love smooth jazz. Throughout my childhood, or more accurately, throughout my entire time in their house, they listened to it constantly. When I was 8, when I was 21. smooth jazz. I mean, my Mom still rocks Dave Koz's Christmas CD every December. Kenny G's rendition of Auld Lang Syne (paired with a patriotic pastiche of memorable American quotes) resonates in the halls every year. So it makes sense, on some level, how the faint remnants of a certain, rather embarrassing musical genre might stick with me. Might brandish my ego. Right? Well, if my concision hasn't convinced you... It makes sense like this:

When you're 8, music doesn't mean anything. Or more precisely: it means the same as everything else. It's something you may or may not take naturally too; it's kind of fun to play, capitalistic enough to buy and straight-up accessible enough to mold to the shape of your life, but it doesn't mean a whole lot. It's the same as everything else. But parents. Parents mean a lot to an eight-year old. We're talking priorities here. I mean, they're old, and mature. They have a lot of money, personal belongings, and the power to take away your personal belongings. They like music that sounds cool and speak in tongues about it - an entire world unexplored. So naturally, parents know what's up when it comes to music. A equals B equals C. This is important logic.

Following this logic, it also makes sense how I would idolize them. 65 GTO's, family gatherings, Kevin Costner, Jesus, etc. Entirely copying them was good enough for my 8 year old self. I took piano lessons like my Mom and tried to play hockey like my Dad. But nothing came close to the idolization surrounding their general abilities in, knowledge of, and taste connected to and with music. I adored the music they listened to. And that musical love was something I straight-up unabashedly copied. To this day I still copy it. Seriously, if Johnny Lang's jeans were easy for an 8 year old to obtain, I would have been that 8 year old. I didn't understand that these elders had (musical) flaws. I didn't have the capacity to question my parents taste in music. Sure, my Mom and Dad had gems in their music collections, but the shit they listened to for fun? Now, all I want to do is vomit down the front of my shirt. Then: that shit was (supposed to be) dope. Peter White was apparently amazing and Basia sang some great songs. That's how it was, plain and simple. I legitimately gave it a shot... and like the several confused and failed years of praise-and-worship = seeing Jesus, I tried. I definitely remember a shit-wrecked encounter with Gato Barbieri's Que Pasa where my head exploded. And I did, as much as I hate to admit it, establish a not-so-ironic love for George Benson's Breezin, but for the most part, while my parents beasted Joe Sample on numerous car rides around the Minneapolis lakes, I looked out the window and thought about how awesome it would become. I envisioned David Sanborn's ostensible hyper-passion the same way I envisioned eating caviar as a grown-up and how awesome that would probably be. I just didn't see it yet: someday, when I'm older, then I'll get it. Then I'll understand it.

Obviously, I never understood it the way I envisioned because people don't eat caviar. My parents stopped being idols and became parents. Naturally, I questioned what was once infallible; music I had so immaturely obsessed over lost its surreal sheen. If music once obsessed over became dull, imagine what musical confusion turned into. Shit dude. I fucking hated smooth jazz. Everything about it. As I developed a love for what my pretentious High-School self thought wasreal jazz,I also developed a love for attempting to define what Smooth Jazz was and what made it so terrible. Seriously, don't even try. I know way too many smooth-jazz artists for the reason of antipathy strictly. I never gave myself a good explanationno way could I webster that shit. For year's, I turned my nose down at it, mocked my Mom for attending Jeff Lorber's Christmas party, my Dad for utilizing Candy Dulfer as the new-stereo-system test-tone. To my arrogant stuck-up self, Smooth Jazz was terrible, but I didn't have a reason. Any rational attempt at differentiating it from the more traditional 70's and 80's Jazz forms that I respected (Fusion, Jazz-Funk, Jazz-Rock) fell far short of acceptable. I just gave up. I moved to a college where I didn't have to think about it - Smooth Jazz sat on the shelf, completely loathed but entirely undefined by your's truly.

And (*) this is where I turn to Destroyer's amazing release from 2011; Kaputt. An album has never been so aptly named. When it came out, everybody pretty much adored it. It earned the correct scores, ranked in the correctbest-news, and wound up on my shit-to-listen-to list, which soon became the only thing on my shit-to-listen-to list. What I realize now is that I had unknowingly stopped actually reading the reviews that put it on that hyphenated list; I was really just browsing to see what was new and what was supposed to be good so I might, in a way, bolster my future. And Kaputt was supposed to be really good. I, again, didn't even realize I had forgotten to read a single thing they had to say about it. I couldn't just let them poke me incessantly for a couple months, like I would have four years ago. Following the true masochistic tendencies of my subconscious, I waited for that punch in the face, as I wandered in unknown solitude, developing my own opinions about Kaputt, while I and it unintentionally destroyed my 2011 (apt pun, I know). For the record, thanks Destroyer. My top 10 is like 9 albums long. And number 9 is really pushing it.

By the end of June, my face realllly hurt. And, just so we're clear, that's not a metaphor for the confidence I hold in my opinions, it's more a metaphor for the sake of metaphors. It's more a metaphor for the feeling of never having been punched in the face before. I'll go into more depth on the actual album later, so bear with the abridged version of my opinions: what I heard as an entirely groundbreaking collection of songs built on true ensemble playing, the kind of instrumental interaction seldom (never) heard in indie rock, a lyricist at the top of his game, and some of the most interesting production of 2011 was called... smooth-jazz. Wait, what? That's when I realized I really hadn't been reading what they were writing. These people just had to go bringing Smooth Jazz and that dreaded definition entirely back into my life. Big-Time. WTF everyone? No way could I hold onto the notions and ideas I developed (in solitude) about Kaputt when every single critic was ranting about it and not feel betrayed. Not just ranting about it; belittling the shit out of it. No way could I ignore the general consensus, ignore the sheer majority of music critics, the metropolis they populate. This was all cited as Smooth Jazz by the metropolis. Bah! Smooth Jazz? Soft-rock? Sade? What?? The general consensus also revealed something rather astonishing. Something I've been feeling for a couple years now but never had any real evidence to prove my gut right.

These critics, in what I came to see as an exercise in sheer efficiency, exiled Destroyer'ssoundto the smooth/soft dungeons of distaste. How quickly could one really tag Kaputt as kitsch, you ask? Well, I've taken the liberty of compiling a best-of lista sort of competition, as it were.

  1. The simply-named Scott from No Genre, last paragraph. “The appropriation of smooth jazz/soft rock kitsch isnt funny or inventive or postmodern; its depressing.
  2. Matthew Fiander of Popmatters, a little earlier than Scott. “At its base...a soft-rock album... right down to the quasi-smoky sax fills and airy drumming.
  3. Ben Rateliff of the Times, late 2nd paragraph.Basically its Mr. Bejars late-70s-and-early-80s ambient and new-romantic tag-sale blowout, swathed in cheesy electronic drums with strokes of flute and trumpet and purely decorative tenor saxophone.
  4. Ryan Dombal, in Pitchfork's yearly round-up-blurb, second paragraph:The languid music constantly flirts with bad taste stalwarts like lite jazz and soft rock.
  5. Dombol's brethren, Mark Richardson, in his full review from early 2011, first paragraph.The production and arrangements evoke a narrow window of time-- sometime between, say, 1977 and 1984, or between Chuck Mangione's "Feels So Good" and Sade's Diamond Life with stops along the way for Roxy Music's Avalon and Steely Dan's Gaucho. It slides between soft rock, smooth jazz, and new romantic pop.
  6. Ed Comental, for Tiny Mix Tapes, third sentence:Daniel Bejar here indulges in some of the most poorly regarded pop genres of all time: smooth jazz, new age ambient, easy listening, and white disco.
  7. Third-place, AllMusic's Kristopher Monger, second sentence .Kaputt is fully committed to its cause, wrapping everything up in a pristine, immaculately produced biosphere thats filled to the brim with twinkling synths, soft rock drums, and enough wailing trumpets and saxophones to out-mellow Kenny G, David Sanborn, and Dave Koz combined.
  8. Technically, the runner-up is really the winner, as he uttered this before anything else. Keelan H of Sputnikmusic, first sentence.Smooth jazz, soft-rock disco, and 80s new wave are volatile genres to be playing with if youre Dan Bejar (or, anybody for that matter). If you were to poll the average Destroyer fan regarding their favourite genres, these three wouldnt exactly be popular choices.
  9. Laura Snapes' review for NME, also first sentence.To anyone who experienced Hall & Oates’ ’80s reign, pastel horns, louche bass and reverb signify the decades worst excesses; to us, their cheesiness is as mysterious as finding flamingo slacks covered in suspect stains in your parentsattic.If not for anything other than Bejar's lyric (Melodymaker, NME, allsoundslikeadreamtome), that takes the cake.

Compiling this startling collection of quotes was by no means difficult; every single review likens Destroyer's sound on Kaputt to a smooth-jazz/soft-rock aesthetic defined by the bands who were actually associated with that it when they were thriving, coupled with a colorful index of arbitrary adjectives (re: slinky, smooth, lite (sic), cheesy, smoky, easy, romantic, et al.) Simply search google forDestroyer Kaputt saxophone.Every single reference to the instrument is paired with one the adjectives listed. I'm not kidding:Dreamy saxophone solos.” “Supple and buttery.” “Soft-driven saxophone.” “Cheesy saxophones solos.” “Buttery-sax-segueing-easily-into--makeout-inducing-smooth-jazz vibe.The sax solos alone will be enough to send many people screaming.I mean, seriously - those were from the first page. Kinda sounds like the metropolis had a town meeting and agreed on some things. They also agreed to just kind of forget about some differences. Ok, they really forgot about some differences.

Popular music criticism used to be so ruthless in regards to minute discrepancies. So closely associated with the ability to boil down a band's sound into two-words-by-making-up-two-words (shit-gaze, chillwave, post-metal, post-dubstep etc.) for the sake of showing, like it or not, how different two syllables/phrases/songs/albums/artists etc. were. And it was effective. But then Kaputt hit. And they kind of forgot that smooth-jazz and soft-rock were different. Two massive genres, each with its own respective college-library of material, became synonymous. I mean, sure, to the average person, they're the same. And to the average person, they're whatever. And pitchfork's never enjoyed showing the average person how stupid they are. And Criticism's about stating the obvious and being obsolete. Right.

What Destroyer really did was take an inventory of sorts. They released an enigmatic masterpiece, an era-defining piece of art, and asked the critics to authenticate it. To listen, criticize, analyze, reference, et al. Ya know, do what critics do. Just set the loop and then go wild. What this inventory of today's collective critical analysis and authentication of popular-music revealed is the scary reality that the popular-music criticism of today is boringnot just monotonous and bland, but unimportant. It's transformed into its shamed conservative anti-radical sibling. Journalism. Turns out, the employees have been jackin merch unnoticed for a couple years. Robbing the company (ok, I'm done with this analogy) tradition of its most effective weapon: Name-Dropping.

As of right now, I haven't exactly figured out how to display infinite posts/lines per page.  If you've gotten this far, the story/article/essay continues on the next page. Click "Older Posts" to keep reading, if you like.